Hidden Truth/Hidden Truth.iso/data/newspostings/1701-1800/1791

Internet Message Format | 1996-06-21 | 5.4 KB

Path: news.demon.co.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!netcom.net.uk!ix.netcom.com!netnews.worldnet.att.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!ott.istar!istar.net!n2tor.istar!tor.istar!news.inforamp.net!news
From: JP <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.visitors
Subject: Re: Lazar's Anti-G & Dr. Paul Hill (NASA propulsion scientist)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 17:18:05 -0400
Organization: iSTAR Internet Inc.
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <4qcg05$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: internet.iosco.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win95; I)
To: "J. Maynard Gelinas" <[e-mail]>
Xref: news.demon.co.uk alt.conspiracy.area51:11398 alt.paranet.ufo:54075 alt.alien.visitors:88859

J. Maynard Gelinas wrote:
>
>         Regardless of Lazer's proclaimed, though undetermined, schoolastic
> credentials, and his Nevada-esque norms on sexual adventurism, one
> correlation between his anti-gravity claims and Dr. Paul Hills' analysis
> is the supposed ability of a disc-shaped craft to 'focus' gravity waves
> either to a point or diffuse those waves across an area underneath the craft.
>
>         'Without the ability to focus a force field, the field would have
> little value to a UFO.  Suppose that their propulsive field had sperical
> symmetry.  That is, suppose that it had equal strength in all
> directions.  Then the UFO would decend to earth on a radial vertical
> path, or leave earth in a radial direction, but it could not maneuver or
> even travel horizontally.  UFOs must and can point their force field in
> any desired direction, an ability which requires focusing and the ability
> to point the beam.... .... The observer [taken from account by Jacques
> and Janine Vallee's ''Challange to science'' sourced from Hill] noted that
> the object had the shape of a hemisphere, or inverted bowl, and that as it
> hovered what he at first thought to be jets were in reality formed by a
> luminous cone [references to sketches], that opened up under the object
> like an umbrella, giving the impression that it was ''rising, on luminous
> flames.''  Of course, the reader now knows it is rising above cold
> plasma, not flames.  The object then tilted, base toward the viewer after
> takeoff, and which the object was going away the plasma zone was shaped
> as [focused to a point from the base of the craft in a sketch].
>
>         'This amazing sequence indicates that this UFO (aproximately a
> saucer) could:
>
>         1. Sharply focus, resulting in a plasma cone.
>         2. Broadly focus, as in the umbrella act
>         3. Could exhibit a plasma zone shaped like an inverted gas flame,
>                 suggesting that the plasma is swept inward by the axially
>                 symmetric air flow about the vehicle.
>         4. Point the focused field in any direction it chooses (by
>                 vehicle tilting).'
>
>                 'Unconventional Flying Objeccts'
>                 Dr. Paul Hill (NASA propulsion scientist)
>                 ISBN 1-57174-027-9
>                 ***NOTE*** Hill refers to an anti-gravity, or anti-graviton
>                 particle beam as a 'force field,' or a 'field of force.'
>
>         Compare this to Mark Hines' article on Bob Lazer where he states:
>
>         'The gravity amplifiers themselves are three tubes about two feet
> in diameter and four feet long. They are arranged in a triangular
> configuration below a false floor and above the bottom of the craft. The
> reactor is centered between the three amplifiers because the wave is also
> present at the bottom of the reactor. The reactor acts as a transmitter,
> similar to a Tesla Coil, in that each amplifier is independently tuned to
> function as an amplifying receiver. Gravity waves have amplitude,
> wavelength and frequency, just as any other wave does. As the amplitude is
> increased, gravitational waves bend space around the disc.  Each of the
> three gravity amplifiers produces its own gravitational wave, and,
> depending on how the amplifiers are oriented, gravity waves can be focused
> on a point or spread out. On gimbols, each amplifier can operate
> independently. The waves are phase shifted, which changes the wave's
> orientation and plane from zero to 180 degrees, thereby changing the
> attraction or repulsion of the wave. When a disc operates on only one
> amplifier, standing on a pedestal of gravity, it is said to operate in an
> omicron configuration. In this configuration, the other two amplifiers are
> freed for other uses--such as picking up cattle.'
>
>                 --Found at:
> http://galaxy.einet.net/galaxy/Community/Parascience/Unidentified-Flying-Objects/mark-hines/lazar.html
>
>         Without concerning ourselves whether Lazars' claims are accurate,
> or even true, I find it interesting that he made this point years before
> Hill published his book; posthumously, it's worth noting, but I think
> it's safe to argue that neither ever met or made contact.  Now one could
> argue that this should be obvious to any propulsion specialist.
> *Anything* that moves through space intentionally requires some form of
> controlled and focused propulsion.  Still, this is a curious development.
>
>                                                 jmg


Have you found other testimonies that tend to confirm Robert Lazar's
theories?

Sincerely,

J.P.